|
Dam removal to yield
fast-flowing stream
Author: Wade Rawlins; Staff Writer
DURHAM -- The Pleasant Green Dam gives the Eno River two
personalities: its languid, deep water upstream and a fast-flowing, boulder
strewn river below.
A plan to remove the deteriorating 89-year-old concrete dam would lower
the water level and return a 1.5-mile stretch of impounded water to its
former self, a shallow, fast-flowing stream.
It would be the fourth old dam torn down to improve fish migration
patterns in Eastern North Carolina since 1997.
Park and wildlife officials say removing the concrete barrier would
return the river to its natural state and allow fish and mussels to move
freely upriver, expanding the gene pool of some rare species. That's a
particular concern with the Eno's endangered mussels, such as the Atlantic
pigtoe mussel and yellow lampmussel that depend on migration of fish to
ferry their larvae up and down river.
"The biggest gain is the health of the river," said Dave Cook, supervisor
of the Eno River State Park. "Rivers do better when they don't have dams in
their way. We have species that we are concerned about. ... We're trying to
eliminate where man has altered the habitat."
But some neighbors of the Eno aren't eager to see the slow, meandering
river that borders their back yards disappear.
"We think it will decrease the value of our property," said Rebekah Burks
of Orange County. "We think once the water drains out, we will have a big
ditch in our back yard."
The Eno -- the name comes from an Indian word meaning "great way" --
rises in Orange County and flows east across Durham County, eventually
feeding into Falls Lake. Duke Power Company dammed the Eno in eastern Orange
County in 1915 to provide cooling water for a steam power generation plant
that stood nearby. That plant was retired in the late 1950s and removed.
Only the 122-foot-wide concrete dam remains.
It creates more than a mile of slow-moving, pondlike water that canoeists
who love flat water seek out. Pleasant Green Road is the state
park's fourth most popular access point to the river. It's the one stretch
of the Eno that can always be paddled, no matter the height of the rest of
the river.
But a 2001 study determined that the dam will fail eventually if not
removed or replaced. The estimated cost of removing the dam is $92,000 to
$229,000, far less expensive than replacing it. Engineers' estimates of
repairing or replacing the dam range from $300,000 to more than $1 million.
Two existing gates are inoperable, and structural weaknesses pose safety and
liability issues for the state park.
"The dam, it could last 50 more years, or it could break tomorrow," Cook
said. "Nobody knows."
But Cook said it would be irresponsible to let the dam fail.
Some say it won't fail
Ted Williams, a retired industrial hygienist, likes to take his
grandchildren canoeing on the smooth water above the dam. He raises cattle
and goats on an Orange County farm bordering the river.
"I've been walking on that dam since I was 10 years old," said Williams,
67. "It hasn't changed much. It has always had leaks. It's never going to
break and go flooding down to Durham."
Williams said that what bothers him is that no one would consider
removing the quaint mill dam at West Point on the Eno, which is part of a
Durham city park and does the same thing as the Pleasant Green
dam.
Cook said the Eno had a history of 30 mills along its banks, and the mill
dam served a historical purpose, powering the last of those mills.
"There are definite benefits to keeping that one," Cook said.
Habitat would expand
Park officials said there is no question that removing Pleasant
Green dam will reduce the recreational opportunities for canoeists
wanting flat water. But there are similar impounded areas behind the West
Point mill dam and the backwaters of Falls Lake.
Mike Wicker, a biologist with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, said
the dam separated populations of fish and other species that are in low
number in the river and effectively stopped mussels from moving upstream.
"They are the type of animals that would do well in the area," Wicker
said. "By having it impounded, it's not suitable habitat for mussels and
snail."
Removal of the dam would restore 13 miles of the Eno and 42 miles of
tributary streams from Pleasant Green Road to the existing Ben
Johnson dam in Hillsborough.
Park officials have discussed removal of the dam since 1997. Hugh Heine
of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the lead agency on the project, said
the dam could be removed as soon as this fall.
Neighbors concerned
The board of directors of the Eno River Association, a non-profit group
that seeks to protect the river, does not oppose removing the dam, said Lori
Olson, executive director.
Another neighbor, Max Isbell, a physician assistant whose house is near
the river, said removing the dam would likely mean that his house would not
get flooded again. It had 24 inches in the lower level after Hurricane Fran.
But like other property owners, Isbell expressed concern about the
appearance of the lowered river once the dam is gone.
"We're not totally opposed to the idea of it coming down," Isbell said.
"We just have concerns about the state of the river when it comes down and
how long it will take it to return to its so-called natural state."
Copyright 2004 by The News & Observer Pub. Co.
|